"In reviewing some of the Mizrahi-Sephardi literature, I was amazed to see how little of it, In particular those articles that address racism in Israel, also take up the problem of Zionism. Many of the articles that I read, including surprisingly, most of the Israeli feminist articles on Mizrahi women in Israel, took the existence of Israel as a given, leaving Palestinian losses at the hands of the Israeli state unquestioned while addressing the systematic exclusion of Mizrahim from positions of power in the Israeli public sphere.
Against the rise of the Shas party and the ongoing desire on the part of Ashkenazi intellectuals to conflate Mizrahi political agency with the extreme Right, I believe it is crucial that Arab Jews begin to excavate the history and possibility of a radical Mizrahi identity, one that both rescues and protects the cultural legacies of those whose ancestors and families lives in Arab countries while simultaneously opposing the ongoing oppression of Palestinian peoples.
…
However much we can learn from this history we cannot ignore the past six decades in which Mizrahim have not only paid an enormous cost, culturally and spiritually, but also participated in the survival of the Israeli state. Without indulging in nostalgia or denial, it seems necessary to find spaces (critical, geographic, cultural and spiritual) where new Mizrahi identities (Israeli, European, in the Americas and elsewhere) may be allowed to flourish, both locally and transnationally, that is, in conversation with each other across national borders."
— “History’s Traces” by Kyla Wazana Tompkins in Arab and Arab American Feminisms.
"As was obvious to most participants worldwide, however, there was an additional layer to the cynical exploitation of the Palestinian tragedy going on at this conference, for the “Palestinian hijack” accusation provided the United States with an excuse to opt out of the conference, thus avoiding any discussion of reparations for slavery. As international human rights activist Ibrahim Ramey put it, “Most of the NGOs in Durban suspected that the real reason for the [U.S.] withdrawal was the reluctance of the government to confront the issue of systemic racism within the U.S. itself, and the African-American case for reparations.” Thus, the United States avoided any discussions of the issues mentioned (racism in the death penalty, world responsibility for the AIDS epidemic and so on), as well as reparations for the descendants for enslaved Africans, by claiming Palestinian “hijacking” of the conference. This move could have hindered coalition building among international projustice activists, were it not for the already tarnished image of the U.S. government in the world, by the Bush administration’s warmongering and unconditional support for Israel, as the latter engaged in ever more serious violations of international law."
— Nada Elia on the US’ withdrawal from the Durban racism conference in 2001 on the grounds that Israeli racism was unfairly targeted when it was mentioned at all out of hundreds of other issues discussed at the conference, a move that Obama repeated at Durban II. From “The Burden of Representation: When Palestinians Speak Out” in Arab and Arab American Feminisms.