"In reviewing some of the Mizrahi-Sephardi literature, I was amazed to see how little of it, In particular those articles that address racism in Israel, also take up the problem of Zionism. Many of the articles that I read, including surprisingly, most of the Israeli feminist articles on Mizrahi women in Israel, took the existence of Israel as a given, leaving Palestinian losses at the hands of the Israeli state unquestioned while addressing the systematic exclusion of Mizrahim from positions of power in the Israeli public sphere.

Against the rise of the Shas party and the ongoing desire on the part of Ashkenazi intellectuals to conflate Mizrahi political agency with the extreme Right, I believe it is crucial that Arab Jews begin to excavate the history and possibility of a radical Mizrahi identity, one that both rescues and protects the cultural legacies of those whose ancestors and families lives in Arab countries while simultaneously opposing the ongoing oppression of Palestinian peoples.

However much we can learn from this history we cannot ignore the past six decades in which Mizrahim have not only paid an enormous cost, culturally and spiritually, but also participated in the survival of the Israeli state. Without indulging in nostalgia or denial, it seems necessary to find spaces (critical, geographic, cultural and spiritual) where new Mizrahi identities (Israeli, European, in the Americas and elsewhere) may be allowed to flourish, both locally and transnationally, that is, in conversation with each other across national borders."

— “History’s Traces” by Kyla Wazana Tompkins in Arab and Arab American Feminisms.

"As was obvious to most participants worldwide, however, there was an additional layer to the cynical exploitation of the Palestinian tragedy going on at this conference, for the “Palestinian hijack” accusation provided the United States with an excuse to opt out of the conference, thus avoiding any discussion of reparations for slavery. As international human rights activist Ibrahim Ramey put it, “Most of the NGOs in Durban suspected that the real reason for the [U.S.] withdrawal was the reluctance of the government to confront the issue of systemic racism within the U.S. itself, and the African-American case for reparations.” Thus, the United States avoided any discussions of the issues mentioned (racism in the death penalty, world responsibility for the AIDS epidemic and so on), as well as reparations for the descendants for enslaved Africans, by claiming Palestinian “hijacking” of the conference. This move could have hindered coalition building among international projustice activists, were it not for the already tarnished image of the U.S. government in the world, by the Bush administration’s warmongering and unconditional support for Israel, as the latter engaged in ever more serious violations of international law."

— Nada Elia on the US’ withdrawal from the Durban racism conference in 2001 on the grounds that Israeli racism was unfairly targeted when it was mentioned at all out of hundreds of other issues discussed at the conference, a move that Obama repeated at Durban II.  From “The Burden of Representation: When Palestinians Speak Out” in Arab and Arab American Feminisms.

idttirab:

A South African perspective by Mbuyiseni Ndlozi on BDS

Really good short talk from this year’s Israeli Apartheid Week in London

(Source: thesmellofmypyjama)

Now, Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank are attempting to steal perhaps the most important symbol and source of economic sustenance for rural Palestinians: olive oil and olive culture.

A professionally made YouTube video released by the “Matteh Binyamin Regional Council” – an entity that represents dozens of illegal Israeli colonies in the occupied West Bank – aims to convince Israelis that Jewish settlers, not Palestinians, are the true caretakers of the region’s olive trees and the historic heirs of its olive culture.

Read the rest.

israelfacts:

Israel approves 1,100 illegal homes in East Jerusalem just three days after their call for renewed negotiations with the PA
Israel’s government has granted the go-ahead for construction of 1,100 new housing units in illegally occupied east Jerusalem, raising already heightened tensions fuelled by last week’s Palestinian move to seek full UN membership.
(Photo: Getty Images)

Let’s not talk about settler violence without talking about its causes.

israelfacts:

Israel approves 1,100 illegal homes in East Jerusalem just three days after their call for renewed negotiations with the PA

Israel’s government has granted the go-ahead for construction of 1,100 new housing units in illegally occupied east Jerusalem, raising already heightened tensions fuelled by last week’s Palestinian move to seek full UN membership.

(Photo: Getty Images)

Let’s not talk about settler violence without talking about its causes.

thepalestineyoudontknow:

Old Palestinian poster about Sabra and Shatila massacre : “despite the massacres , we born again”

thepalestineyoudontknow:

Old Palestinian poster about Sabra and Shatila massacre : “despite the massacres , we born again”

myadolescenceispersonified:

“A Child’s View From Gaza”

An Oakland children’s museum, citing pressure from the community, canceled a planned exhibit of artwork by Palestinian youth ages 8-14 that depicted the Israeli assault during the 2008-09 Gaza conflict.

These are a few of the images.

Credit: libyanana for posting it on her wall. (;

Oh nice, I’m glad somebody made this post so I don’t have to.  The EI post on it is worth a read.

antennatika:

Did anyone say housing protests?

aljazeera:

Why boycott Israel? | A founding member of the campaign for the academic and cultural boycott outlines the motivation behind the movement.

“The logic of the BDS movement has also remained consistent. The basic  logic of BDS is the logic of pressure, not diplomacy, persuasion, or  dialogue. Diplomacy as a strategy for achieving Palestinian rights has  proven to be futile, due to the protection and immunity Israel enjoys  from hegemonic world powers and those in their orbit.
Second, the logic of persuasion has also shown its bankruptcy, since  no amount of “education” of Israelis about the horrors of occupation and  other forms of oppression seems to have turned the tide. Dialogue  between Palestinians and Israelis, which remains very popular among  Israeli liberals and Western foundations and governments that fund the  activities, has also failed miserably. Dialogue is often framed in terms  of “two sides to the story”, in the sense that each side must  understand the pain, anguish, and suffering of the other, and to accept  the narrative of the other.
 This presents the “two sides” as if they were equally culpable, and  deliberately avoids acknowledgment of the basic coloniser-colonised  relationship. Dialogue does not promote change, but rather reinforces  the status quo, and in fact is mainly in the interest of the Israeli  side of the dialogue, since it makes Israelis feel that they are doing  something while in fact they are not. The logic of BDS is the logic of  pressure. And that pressure has been amplifying.”

aljazeera:

Why boycott Israel? |
A founding member of the campaign for the academic and cultural boycott outlines the motivation behind the movement.

“The logic of the BDS movement has also remained consistent. The basic logic of BDS is the logic of pressure, not diplomacy, persuasion, or dialogue. Diplomacy as a strategy for achieving Palestinian rights has proven to be futile, due to the protection and immunity Israel enjoys from hegemonic world powers and those in their orbit.

Second, the logic of persuasion has also shown its bankruptcy, since no amount of “education” of Israelis about the horrors of occupation and other forms of oppression seems to have turned the tide. Dialogue between Palestinians and Israelis, which remains very popular among Israeli liberals and Western foundations and governments that fund the activities, has also failed miserably. Dialogue is often framed in terms of “two sides to the story”, in the sense that each side must understand the pain, anguish, and suffering of the other, and to accept the narrative of the other.

This presents the “two sides” as if they were equally culpable, and deliberately avoids acknowledgment of the basic coloniser-colonised relationship. Dialogue does not promote change, but rather reinforces the status quo, and in fact is mainly in the interest of the Israeli side of the dialogue, since it makes Israelis feel that they are doing something while in fact they are not. The logic of BDS is the logic of pressure. And that pressure has been amplifying.”

(via haralambros)

I love Anarchists Against the Wall, I’m just saying.

(Source: haralambros)